In twitter I learned from several people in the new Google browser called Chrome, given that they gave me very different opinions I decided to do my own analysis and this was what I found. - first thing I noticed was the license, is free and distributed under a BSD license .
- The interface is pleasing to the eye, although I was a bit difficult to get the menu, one quickly ends up getting used.
- open pages faster compared to FF3. Spend
- Acid2test perfectly. In
- about "Official Build 1583 ,
- gmail or facebook , I heard you on slow connections some of these pages do not open. 12 tabs open and go as usual. Conclusions
The Good: not got no visible error, despite what I read on pages that did not open, no nothing like that happened to me, I could not see if it was true what slow connections, to be a beta is a good option, plus is free software, something exceedingly rare in people of Google.
Bad: as I mentioned, I got no visible defects the chrome, surely it all has its flaws and even more still beta, but it is something that always resolves.
The ugly: Google seems to follow the footsteps of microsoft as a monopoly concerns, is that perhaps was not best to support open source projects, you may have your reasons for doing so, I respect but not support .
this is the link.
0 comments:
Post a Comment